Last Sunday was the Survivor Series 2016 in Toronto, Canada. The “main event” of the show was the fight between Bill Goldberg vs. Brock Lesnar. In addition to being a monumental match given the star power of the two individuals concerned, this match also marked the return to the ring of Goldberg after 12 years of absence.

And the least that can be said is that no one expected the turn of events. Goldberg simply destroyed Brock Lesnar in less than a minute and a half after two Spears (and which Spears!) And a Jackhammer. Even if a lot of fans, starting with the people in the room in Toronto and your servant, loved this issue, some wrestling fans did not like Goldberg dominating the “Beast” Brock Lesnar. If I am never the last to criticize the choices made by WWE, I find that Vince McMahon and company have made the right decision this time. And I will explain why in returning to certain points mentioned here and there.

Some fans think that Goldberg’s destruction of Brock Lesnar spits on the end of the Undertaker’s “Streak” at WrestleMania 30 (the Undertaker won his first 21 games at WrestleMania before losing to Brock Lesnar). People were totally shocked and upset by the defeat of the Undertaker of which were big fans of Deadman. People will always remember the atmosphere in the stadium after this game and then in the streets of New Orleans throughout the evening. As far as people are concerned, Goldberg has avenged the Undertaker. Moreover, Brock Lesnar has lost a number of games since the night of April 6, 2014. It is not as if Lesnar was on an uninterrupted series of wins.

This leads me to my second point. Some fans believe that “the honor” to convincingly overcome Brock Lesnar should have returned to a younger wrestler whose career would have benefited from such a situation. If this idea is good on paper, it cannot be implemented at the moment and we do not know when it could have been done. The WWE is unable to create new Babyface Superstars that are unanimous to the public. A victory of Roman Reigns on Brock Lesnar would have been rejected almost unanimously by all fans who would have seen it as an umpteenth attempt to stuff crane. A victory of Seth Rollins would not have made move his level of popularity of an iota. Same conclusion for a wrestler like Dean Ambrose. And this remark applies to many other wrestlers. A convincing defeat of Brock Lesnar against Samoa Joe for example would not talk on ESPN and the rest of the media (including international) and would certainly not raise crowds (what I write is not a criticism of wrestlers but Of the current WWE scriptwriters). Fans do not see the stars of the moment as being on the same level as Brock Lesnar. To lose the latter against one of them would have been pure waste.
Can you bet on WWE? Well, Top Online Casinos South Africa has got a surprise for you. Of course, you can bet on WWE games, but most importantly, Top Online Casinos focuses more on Boxing, Soccer, Horse Racing, Golf, Tennis, and Formula 1. With the creation of Online Sports Betting sites, players can now place bets on less popular types of sports including WWE.

If Goldberg had been rejected by the public on his return, and his contract had not been extended, WWE would have had no interest in winning his match against Brock Lesnar in this way. But it turns out that the popularity of the former WCW champion took everyone by surprise. Goldberg was greeted with open arms by (almost) all fans and the audiences of the shows experienced a significant rise when he was on the screen. Even the Toronto public, which generally goes against the wishes of the WWE, has given a golden welcome to Goldberg. In a handful of appearances, Goldberg has become the number one star of the WWE. The federation has talked more about it since Goldberg came back than before. After the Brock Lesnar vs Goldberg match last Sunday, many fans were eager to see Raw the next day to find out what was going to happen next. When did a Pay Per View of WWE provoke such a reaction for the last time?
Regarding the reputation of Brock Lesnar, it is absolutely not tainted by this defeat, however spectacular. I would even say that it would have been more damaged if Goldberg’s victory had taken place after a longer and balanced fight. As it stands, Goldberg’s victory can be seen as a stroke of luck due to a moment of inattention by Brock Lesnar. It’s a fairly old-fashioned scenario in the wrestling world and I imagine that WWE will play on it when the former UFC world champion returns. And I would tend to imagine that the next game Goldberg vs Lesnar will end with the victory of Paul Heyman’s protégé.

Brock Lesnar is a businessman. Last Sunday’s battle did not take place this way without his approval. He understood that the prolongation of his rivalry with a Goldberg hot as the embers in popularity (warmer than any other wrestler of the moment as I said above) would have more than positive consequences for his bank account . By losing in this way against Goldberg, he now has a new rival to his level that fans take seriously. If the WWE plays its cards well, Goldberg vs. Lesnar 3 could be one of the most important fights of WrestleMania 33. Personally, I would rather see Goldberg take another path and chase the title as he told Raw (‘I’ve never been a fan of Brock Lesnar and I find him over-riding). But the Survivor Series match made it clear that the two men will again face at WrestleMania 33. You can visit https://www.onlinepokies.site/ for more information about WWE 2K17 which features Brock Lesnar as game cover. 

 

Click Here: cheap INTERNATIONAL jersey